• You are viewing the forum as a Guest, please login (you can use your Facebook, Twitter, Google or Microsoft account to login) or register using this link: Log in or Sign Up

Lighting distance from water surface?

madlan

madlan

Member
Joined
29 Sep 2010
Messages
241
Location
Stevenage, Hertfordshire
Hi all,

How much of an effect does having the lighting close to the water surface make on PAR?
I'm using some LED strips that are waterproof - I could easily mount them 1" above the water, or attach them to the shelf above which is about 8" above the water surface...
 
Hi all,
madlan said:
Are we talking a massive difference for 8" ?
Click to expand...
Depends upon the beam angle. Light intensity (and therefore PAR) declines as a square of the distance from the source.

Photo_img039.jpg


If you have a narrow beam angle light intensity will decline more slowly (the light spread will be over a smaller angle), but if you have a wide angle PAR will fall much more swiftly.

cheers Darrel
 
Thanks Darrel :)

Each meter has 120 x 14 Lumen Leds (1680 Lumens per meter), I will be having two strips across a 120cm tank.
So 240cm = 4032 Lumens over the tank.

The tank is only 30cm deep, (20 when water line and substrate are taken into account. I'll also be growing only mosses, what do you think?

I can't see any beam angle info on the website:
120 Led / 1680 Lumen 15.6 W Cool White 6000k Led Tape (1 Metre) IP67
 
Have you ever used LED strips before? I use them on some dart frog setups, they seem to grow terrestrial plants quite well.

Do you consider 4032 lumens over a 30cm deep 180 litre tank low lighting?

I'm sticking the strips to some steel channelling, these can just sit across the tank without issue. (heat is minimal)

SC1.JPG
 
These are some data I got. The source lights are two 18W PCs... it's different but it should illustrate the point.

parvsdistance.jpg


cheers

GM
 
Hi Darrel. Does your chart consider breaking the water surface as well? Have a look at this YouTube video. PAR is around 490-500 but once it breaks the water's surface it drops to 350-400.

 
Hi all,
flygja said:
Hi Darrel. Does your chart consider breaking the water surface as well? Have a look at this YouTube video. PAR is around 490-500 but once it breaks the water's surface it drops to 350-400.
Click to expand...
No it doesn't, but the figures sound about right. Light intensity will definitely decline as the water depth increases, but I think that the effects of the water will depend on all sorts of factors, one would be the refractive index and the angle of the light beam, another would be internal reflection inside the tank, and a third the clarity of the water.

cheers Darrel
 
dw1305 said:
Hi all,

Depends upon the beam angle. Light intensity (and therefore PAR) declines as a square of the distance from the source.

Photo_img039.jpg


If you have a narrow beam angle light intensity will decline more slowly (the light spread will be over a smaller angle), but if you have a wide angle PAR will fall much more swiftly.

cheers Darrel
Click to expand...


Hi Darrel

I have seen this 1/distance^2 explaination many times in the hobby. The above diagram is true and valid for a point source only. In our tanks we all have tubes or led panels, never point sources. As a physicst I know that for such cases the intensity falls as 1/distance, i.e inverse of distance. Hence the fall is less drastic than expected.

Perhaps we ought to consider this effect as well?

niru

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
 
You might find this link useful as well
PAR vs Distance, T5, T12, PC - New Chart
It comes from a very recent thread which contains one of those brilliant contributions from Ceg.
Annoyingly I can't find the actual thread, but this link that Ceg gave was so interesting I saved it.

4000 lumens low light??? A 2 foot T5HO would typically put out about 1700 lumen.

There will undoubtedly be some loss of PAR with water depth as red light is rapidly absorbed, but in 30cm I doubt it is very significant.

Cheers
 
Hi all,
niru said:
As a physicst I know that for such cases the intensity falls as 1/distance, i.e inverse of distance. Hence the fall is less drastic than expected.
Click to expand...
Yes that is true, and our lights aren't point sources, which is actually why I prefer tubes for growlights over metal halides etc. If you think about the light coming inthrough a window, you still have the same effect, but the larger the window the more light enters the room.You also have to take the effect of the reflector into account, I've got some SON-T growlights with parabolic reflectors and they have an even light fpootprint over quite a large range of distances. The actual calculation for an LED array would have to treat each LED as a point source, and you would end up with a mosiac of light intensities as the beams moved away from the source and intersected.

Looking on the bright side I've just purchased a PAR meter for work <PAR Sensors - Skye Instruments>, so I'm interested to see what it shows.

cheers Darrel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top