Ok so you have a larger tank than I do, we have the samw kH and with 3 bps you manage to drop the ph by 1 unit while I drop it by 1 unit with much much higher bps...and I have no leaks....also I inject it to the inlet of filter through an inline difuser...how come you can do this with less bps?Hi all
I finally made it today. Specs: 65 liters, KH 9, spraybar, medium light, 3 bps, inline atomizer, good surface rippling
Can be probably improved but this was what I meant regarding good rippling. I am probably loosing a lot of gas but this is the best way I found (actually I did not discover this, just good reading and good advice ) to keep the Co2 levels stable during the light period (6.59 to 6.57 was the maximum variation). Look what happens when the solenoid switchs off the CO2... the agitation degasses the water column very quickly and in a few hours my DC is blue.
Jordi
Yes, that is what I was suggesting but the problem is that I am not sure if once you have the volume there will be other reference values for comparing. In Tom Barr's forum there was a thread about this, maybe there is some useful information there.You all can compare co2 rates by using a measuring cup or similar with ml marks. Put the measuring cup into the water and flip upside down. Make sure there is no air trapped in the cup. Now take your co2 device/ tube and put it under the cup making sure all the co2 goes into the cup. Time it to say 1 minute and pull the co2 device/tube from under the cup away so no more co2 goes in the cup. Read how much co2 has been fed into the cup. There you will get a figure of how many ml's of co2 you inject per figure of time, in this example, per minute. I believe this is a much better way to compare co2 injection rates between tanks.
Very nice thread guys.
Im injecting co2 24/7 as to get a 1.1 ph drop all the time. Im doing this in order to not get any fluctuation during photoperiod, which induces algae supposedly. Its very hard for most people to have co2 stable like Parotets case because you need a lot of surface agitation and a lot of bps. Its better yes but i dont see any drawbacks with what Im doing. Bps is lower so its not wasting too much CO2. Fish should be fine as long as co2 is not over the top.
what do you guys think. Its still an experiment for me.