• You are viewing the forum as a Guest, please login (you can use your Facebook, Twitter, Google or Microsoft account to login) or register using this link: Log in or Sign Up

Anoxic filter

john arnold

Member
Joined
28 Jun 2018
Messages
363
Location
Somerset
ok here goes saw this youtube about anoxic filtration and how putting nitrates via fertilisers is stupid as there is plenty in aquarium from waste already, kevin novak is his name he puts cat litter for filter media and seems to be working fine, anyone seen this before, he is some sort of expert dare i say
Anyway what do ya all think
 
he puts cat litter for filter media

Thought about doing that myself, having cat litter with its high Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) in a filter with high flow does make sense in some ways to buffer the water plus it would make a reasonable surface for bacteria to live, would work better in soft water tanks as the higher H+ ions should help keep the CEC properties cat litter working longer
 
Hi all,
Oh he has phd in aquatic microbiology and phd in study of fish so must know his beans
We have had a few threads on Dr Novak's biocenosis buckets. Have a look at <"Ammonia Time Bomb Carpet"> (most of the meat is on page 2., but page 1. is worth a read as well.) and also mention of <"MankySanke">.

I think it is a system that works, but not necessarily in the way that Dr Novak thinks it does.

This is a page from <"Dr Novak's blog">, I'm a great believer that a picture tells a thousand stories, and this is the picture:

IMG_0698.jpg


and this is the Leaf Colour Chart that scientists use to estimate the nitrogen content of plant leaves.

six_panel_lcc.jpg


and that, pretty much conclusively, says to me that the vast majority of the fixed nitrogen is ending up as plant tissue, rather than being removed via anoxic denitrification and out-gassing as nitrogen (N2) gas.

cheers Darrel
 
While he may have post secondary education that is no guarantee that his style of fishkeeping will suit you

As an example

I’ve lifted MC carpets covering 60% of my aquarium bottom (after over a year) and never seen anything like the debris he’s showcasing in this video
My initial thoughts
- massive overfeeding
- insufficient water changes
- improper (or no) vacuuming of the carpet/substrate
None of which may be “dealbreakers” as long as his fish are healthy and thriving ... but to proclaim this is what happens with all aquarium plant carpets while assuming his own maintenance regime is not a determining factor :confused: o_O :banghead:

There are other highly educated fish specialists that will argue in favour of water changes :)

In another video (where he encourages limited water changes - or perhaps none, I wasn’t willing to watch the entire video library) he states that his plants are healthy and free of algae ... which is not what I see ;) his plants are OK but definitely not thriving as they might
 
Thought about doing that myself, having cat litter with its high Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) in a filter with high flow does make sense in some ways to buffer the water plus it would make a reasonable surface for bacteria to live, would work better in soft water tanks as the higher H+ ions should help keep the CEC properties cat litter working longer
What sort of cat litter are you referring (and Novak as well)?
- locally available is either clumping clays or various assorted paper, corn, pea products (none of which would be suitable)
I struggle to find any unscented cat litter

I use a clumping clay based litter as it’s the only unscented one available - even when I considered the ridiculously expensive brands (which promise environmental “friendliness”) - all were scented
 
While he may have post secondary education that is no guarantee that his style of fishkeeping will suit you

As an example

I’ve lifted MC carpets covering 60% of my aquarium bottom (after over a year) and never seen anything like the debris he’s showcasing in this video
My initial thoughts
- massive overfeeding
- insufficient water changes
- improper (or no) vacuuming of the carpet/substrate
None of which may be “dealbreakers” as long as his fish are healthy and thriving ... but to proclaim this is what happens with all aquarium plant carpets while assuming his own maintenance regime is not a determining factor :confused: o_O :banghead:

There are other highly educated fish specialists that will argue in favour of water changes :)

In another video (where he encourages limited water changes - or perhaps none, I wasn’t willing to watch the entire video library) he states that his plants are healthy and free of algae ... which is not what I see ;) his plants are OK but definitely not thriving as they might


Yeah some had holes in and iwas like them plants do not look amazing at all amd the tanks too damn small fir those discus and angel fish, so yeah maybe not the mesiah after all
 
Hi all, We have had a few threads on Dr Novak's biocenosis buckets. Have a look at <"Ammonia Time Bomb Carpet"> (most of the meat is on page 2., but page 1. is worth a read as well.) and also mention of <"MankySanke">.

I think it is a system that works, but not necessarily in the way that Dr Novak thinks it does.

This is a page from <"Dr Novak's blog">, I'm a great believer that a picture tells a thousand stories, and this is the picture:

IMG_0698.jpg


and this is the Leaf Colour Chart that scientists use to estimate the nitrogen content of plant leaves.

View attachment 126269

and that, pretty much conclusively, says to me that the vast majority of the fixed nitrogen is ending up as plant tissue, rather than being removed via anoxic denitrification and out-gassing as nitrogen (N2) gas.

cheers Darrel

I had a look and it got far too technical for me but the upshot is no definitive answer again jeez water is very complicated, like my new tank i scaped the monte carlo melted twice second time i increased light intensity and sone is still there also hair grass is not good, all other plants are ok tho, no-one seems to be able to help as too many variables, thsts the way it goes
 
Hi all,
I had a look and it got far too technical for me
That is why I like to look at the pictures.

I don't have to <"understand all the technical bits">, just look at the picture. In the picture the Water Lilies (Nymphaea), and Water Hyacinth (Eichornia), have really large, deep green, glossy leaves.

Healthy, dark green glossy leaves mean that the plants have access to plenty of fixed nitrogen and you don't really need to go any further than that.

Dr Novak can tell you that it is anoxic denitrification is the important process, and that plants are irrelevant, but the photo tells you straight away that isn't true.

cheers Darrel
 
Oh he has phd in aquatic microbiology and phd in study of fish so must know his beans
I know a lot of people with a phd in my field who don't know a lot...........................not impressed by titles.
 
What sort of cat litter are you referring

Well I was only thinking about the pros and cons of using either AS or a suitable Cat Litter to increase the CEC volume of the tank, was in my early days when I had read about why AS works so well in out tanks. Never took it any further.
 
[QUOTE="
This is a page from <"Dr Novak's blog">, I'm a great believer that a picture tells a thousand stories, and this is the picture:
[/QUOTE]

Interesting, in a way this is like a hydroponic system then but where the plants uptake as part of the filtration system. I agree that the plants are more than likely doing most of the heavy lifting, especially when you consider the actual nutrient demands of plants grown in this way. Especially the floating plants, and those not rooted in soil. As an example only, here is a site I found with typical nutrient values required in ppm for hydroponically grown plants. Look away all those in fear of EI! :lol: Explains why my Peace Lilly isn't doing as well as I hoped!
https://www.smart-fertilizer.com/articles/hydroponic-nutrient-solutions
 
Hi all,
As an example only, here is a site I found with typical nutrient values required in ppm for hydroponically grown plants.
Those look about right.

You can actually manipulate the composition, yield and flavour of Tomatoes by changing the nutrient level and salinity of the <"growing solution">. The "10" value quoted in the linked paper is milli-Siemens, so 10,000 microS.

You can also see the difference between Strawberries and the other crops in the link. It is back to the <"orchids and bromeliads"> analogy.

You can find even <"higher nutrient levels"> where people are using floating plants (mainly <"Eichornia"> and Pistia) for <"phytoremediation"> of animal effluents or sewage.

Eichornia crassipes & Pistia are also used for bio-gas production, and my guess would be that if people become more interested in that side of it, rather than the phytoremediation, that we might found that their optimal growth rate (<"under bright illumination">) is in very nutrient rich solutions.

cheers Darrel
 
Back
Top