camera people

Nick16

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
1,761
Location
Surrey, UK
hi, im looking for a decent camera as the one i have doesnt provide decent image quality (old pentax optio A10)
i think my next step may be a digital slr. so all you guys who have a decent camera and can take those amazing shots, what camera do you have?
some info on these would be champion :lol:

Features
Image Quality
Value
Overall
 

Jase

Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
448
Location
Stourbridge
What is your budget? Canon 450Dis a great entry DSLR camera, though I'm sure someone will suggest a Nikon :rolleyes: and you could probably get the d60 or a used d200 for the same money
 

Nick16

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
1,761
Location
Surrey, UK
well, i dont want to spend more than 300 but neaer to 200 is better. cheaper the better really but not cheap and cheerful if you get me.
 

Dan Crawford

Founder
Staff member
Joined
21 Jun 2007
Messages
3,266
Location
Daventry, Northants
I had a Canon 350D and got some good results with it, Graeme Edwards has one and his results speak for themselves! You could no doubt find one of them, if you got a 450D for that money then you'd be doing real well.
 

fish.com1

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2008
Messages
176
Location
North Yorkshire

Nick16

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
1,761
Location
Surrey, UK
i havent a clue what all the technical specs are! the fuji cameras look good but i cant tell if one is better than another. all i know is that having more pixels is good :lol:
 

BigTom

Member
Joined
1 May 2009
Messages
2,281
Location
Edinburgh
For that sort of money, superzooms are probably your best bet, as fish.com said. DSLRs get very expensive once you start factoring in specialist lenses etc.
 

Nick16

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
1,761
Location
Surrey, UK
yeah i see. i just get so confused, i dont know what 99% of the stuff means. i just want a camera that can take really nice shots of my fish tank and use it in day to day life. but i dont want to spend a bomb!
 

Dave Spencer

Member
Joined
3 Jul 2007
Messages
1,389
Location
N. Wales
More megapixels is something of a myth.

Buy an entry level DSLR from one of the main manufacturers and you will be fine.

Dave.
 

Nick16

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
1,761
Location
Surrey, UK
ahh right ok, see i dont know these things and if you dont ask...... :D

cheers for that info. i think i might go for around 10 million pixels. but i will consult some camera fans in my family and then decide which one is best for me.
 

aaronnorth

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
3,953
Location
worksop, nottinghamshire
megapixels doesnt really matter, unless you are going for large prints which i doubt you will. lenses are more important than the camera (to some degree.)
just some basic terms:

aperture (f/) - a larger aperture (smaller number!) for example f/3.5 will minimize the depth of field, and because it is a large opening in the lense, it gives you a quicker shutter speed due to more light being allowed in. A small aperture (big number) like f/22 will give you a greater depth of field., but slower shutter speed
SO for macro shots, and lurring the background f.3.5 will be used most of the time, although you start to experiment once you get used to it.

ISO - camera's sensitivity too light. a low ISO (ISO100) is better, as it reduced noise (little dots on pictures) but it also gives you a slower shutter speed so not always ideal for taking fish pictures, unless you have a load of light over the subject, hence why people on here have studio lighting,
A high ISO (ISO1600) will give you a quicker shutter speed, but may induce noise on the image, but on better camera's they can handle higher ISO's better. I can remeber seeing one of George's shot with ISO 12800 :lol:

Shutter speed - this is how fast the shutter closes. 1/125sec is quick enough for most fish. Trying to achieve this is a combination of the above.

I use aperture priority, This means you set the f/ and the ISO and the camera chooses a suitable shutter speed to get the correctly exposed image. eg i set it too f/3.5 and ISO400 and i get a shutter speed of about 1/60th sec. If i go any higher on the ISO i get considerable noise.
thanks.
 

Nick16

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2008
Messages
1,761
Location
Surrey, UK
thanks for the info mate. It is much appreciated. as said before i like the prices of the fuji's, it seems hard to find a camera that *seems* to have as much for the same price.
 

oldwhitewood

Member
Joined
11 Jul 2007
Messages
356
You could maybe pick up a second hand Nikon D40 with the kit lens for quite cheap I reckon.
 

Dan Crawford

Founder
Staff member
Joined
21 Jun 2007
Messages
3,266
Location
Daventry, Northants
oldwhitewood said:
You could maybe pick up a second hand Nikon D40 with the kit lens for quite cheap I reckon.
Thats similar to what i was trying to say, the D40 and 350D are very alike in that they are bot an entry level SLR and you can get great results from both.
 
Top