AshRolls
Member
Hi there,
Firstly, thanks for this great resource these forums are full of helpful information and feedback. I have already managed to find answers to most of my questions and feel like I am developing a good knowledge of the subject, albeit without much testing on the crucible of 'actually doing it'
Anyhow, I have a couple of outstanding questions I couldn't find the answers to, so I hope you can help. My current set-up is as follows :-
Question 2) Liquid carbon and light intensity... I 'feel' that 2x45W on 180L may be a bit intense for a liquid carbon only tank. I plan on using Amazon Frogbit to provide some shade and reduce the intensity in the tank (plus the Gourami will love it). Can anyone comment on the long term viability of using liquid carbon on a tank. I have seen comments on peoples liquid carbon tanks starting out ok but going downhill after 4 months. Is the process as to why this happens understood? Are there any long term liquid carbon only 'success stories'?
Thanks in advance, I apologise if these questions have already been addressed elsewhere!
*edit* I can take a best guess answer to Question 1, I assume flow is still important and flow dead spots are just as damaging using liquid as pressurised CO2. Flow is also important for nutrient distribution which has nothing to do with CO2. If I want to get away with less flow then I will need to reduce the overall lighting amounts correspondingly to maintain balance.... Is that correct?
Still looking for more feedback on Question 2, the long term viability of using liquid carbon.
Firstly, thanks for this great resource these forums are full of helpful information and feedback. I have already managed to find answers to most of my questions and feel like I am developing a good knowledge of the subject, albeit without much testing on the crucible of 'actually doing it'
Anyhow, I have a couple of outstanding questions I couldn't find the answers to, so I hope you can help. My current set-up is as follows :-
- 2 weeks into establishing Rio 180L tank
- 2x 45W T5HO lights, 4 hour photo-period
- 2x External canister (Fluval 306 and Eheim ecco pro 300) for 12x tank turnover
- 'Double' dosing liquid carbon (Neutro CO2, 8ml)
- EI dosing dry ferts + Seachem Equilibrium (very soft tapwater)
- Seachem Eco-complete substrate
Question 2) Liquid carbon and light intensity... I 'feel' that 2x45W on 180L may be a bit intense for a liquid carbon only tank. I plan on using Amazon Frogbit to provide some shade and reduce the intensity in the tank (plus the Gourami will love it). Can anyone comment on the long term viability of using liquid carbon on a tank. I have seen comments on peoples liquid carbon tanks starting out ok but going downhill after 4 months. Is the process as to why this happens understood? Are there any long term liquid carbon only 'success stories'?
Thanks in advance, I apologise if these questions have already been addressed elsewhere!
*edit* I can take a best guess answer to Question 1, I assume flow is still important and flow dead spots are just as damaging using liquid as pressurised CO2. Flow is also important for nutrient distribution which has nothing to do with CO2. If I want to get away with less flow then I will need to reduce the overall lighting amounts correspondingly to maintain balance.... Is that correct?
Still looking for more feedback on Question 2, the long term viability of using liquid carbon.