My experience backs up this claim too.I can't help it but my experience tells me clearly that TC plants are frail and vulnerable, and my losses are often substantial.
Same experience here. They seem to take much longer to establish and much more susceptible to melt.My experience backs up this claim too.
They take longer to adjust to tank conditions and seem to take much longer to root. I don't quite know how they're meant to be pest resistant when they've never been exposed to pests in the first place. In-vitro plants have basically been "babied" and are not equipped to transition to a submerged state. I've never had an in-vitro plant perform better than others.
TC refers to Tissue culture.What does TC mean …
My experience is similar. Often 100% melt. 🙁I can't help it but my experience tells me clearly that TC plants are frail and vulnerable, and my losses are often substantial
I would rather say its the other way around, rich soils or rather fresh soils might be the cause of melting. I have only sand and dose liquid fertilizer. I have not experienced any melting from invitro plants, they just take a lot of time to get going. Alternatively, maybe immature substrate no matter the type is a problem. I will admit I have not tried invitro plants in brand new sand.These plants are grown in a small protected bubbles so to speak and thinking of carpeting plants in particular it does seem and tropica say that pressurized CO2 is advised . Also the advice is as these plants come out of their little eco system they need feeding from day one. As often they go in nutrient rich soils with liquid fertilisers could this cause melt Is the liquid fertiliser not needed?
I believe you are correct. Once plants are within the aquarium setting they are no more resistant to "pests" than any other plant. Although, due to their early growing conditions, they do not require any transition period. This avoids leaves dying off. unlike traditionally grown plants.I'm wondering if "higher pest resistence" has been caught in a translation error and in fact it's referring to the fact they come from a pest free environment and won't have hitchhikers.
I'd quibble over <"traditionally grown">. I'll be honest, I think all the advantages, in <"both emersed growing"> and <"in vitro plants">, lies <"with the producer">, not the customer.This avoids leaves dying off. unlike traditionally grown plants.
In the experience we have had, although smaller and slow to take off, they have all grown well. We found with on-point water changes and close to an overdose on ferts, they produce very healthy aquascapes. Our favourite method when using In Vitro plants is EI dosing.Quotation from the blog: "in vitro plants have a higher pest resistance compared to non vitro plants grown traditionally."
A few weeks ago we've discussed TC plants' vulnerability, be it pests or physico-chemical conditions. I can't help it but my experience tells me clearly that TC plants are frail and vulnerable, and my losses are often substantial. Is your experience better?
My experience is similar. Often 100% melt. 🙁
It is advised to use CO2 from the start. They are hungry little plants and have been receiving nutrients from the jelly in the tub so a quality soil is needed.These plants are grown in a small protected bubbles so to speak and thinking of carpeting plants in particular it does seem and tropica say that pressurized CO2 is advised . Also the advice is as these plants come out of their little eco system they need feeding from day one. As often they go in nutrient rich soils with liquid fertilisers could this cause melt Is the liquid fertiliser not needed?
It <"could do">, it depends a little bit on the type of plant. It works <"brilliantly with orchids">, which is why you can buy amazing intergeneric grex types for trivial money.Does the monetised benefit come from cloning a single plant, perhaps?