I preferred the wood/stones without the small ring of rocks - which look very unnatural - they will also be soon lost among any plants (so don’t really understand their attraction)
The rounded stones placed between the more jagged (interesting) stone and the wood, are again confusing - how did they appear/occur in this context (aside from being flung by a catapult ...
too much Outlander)
Same goes for those back corner stones which will be quickly lost in planting - note I’m assuming from the wood and other details, you’re not planning an Iwagumi scape, hence my assumptions of taller midground and background plants
There is a current vogue to create aesthetically stunning hardscapes - only to have many of these details lost through plants, and then further absented by stem (over)growth (lack of trimming and shaping, which obviously require practise ... and intent)
I suggest taking detailed photos (and discrete labelling of stones ... depending
) and removing all the hardscape
Then adjust the substrate slope - note this will flatten in water (vs air perception) and through gravity and filter flow currents (camera aspect also flattens the appearance)
Now begin playing with wood positions (as it’s the most dominant aspect in your scape)
Then add main stones
Etc
Also, once flooded, the effects of the rounded edges will be more significant re perception